Sunday Open Discussion
Over the last few weeks, I've gotten into the flow of either having a recap from a Saturday game or a game thread for a Sunday game that needed to be done for Sunday. With neither of those necessary for today, I figured today would be a good day to bring out the time honored open discussion thread. Here are some questions to get started, but as always, feel free diverge from the topic if needed:
- Gilbert Arenas told Mike Wise after the Wizards-Knicks game that he was thinking about coming off the bench when he returns. Good idea or bad idea? Here's Ivan's thoughts.
- I went to Borders a few weeks back and bought Mitchell Krugel's book One Last Shot about MJ's comeback with the Wizards. Has anyone else ready it? What are your thoughts? I've only gotten through the first few chapters, which seem to be focused more on his Chicago days but hopefully it picks up soon. Just remember, there's no fear of spoiling the ending when you discuss the book.
- Fill in the blank Part 1: Maryland's upset of UNC was...
- Fill in the blank Part 2: Deron Washington's dunk was...
- Since we're talking about college basketball, I suppose we might as well talk about the draft a little. What type of player do you think the Wizards should look to get with their pick, and who do you think fits the billing? If you're trying to get a feel for some of the prospects out there, check out DC Pro Sports Report's Mock Draft Database.
- In case you didn't hear, there's a couple of football games on today. Who ya got?
0 recs |
9
comments
Comments
My take
- I'm fine with it is as long as he doesn't stay there too long.
- Already told you.
- Almost as surprising as Roy Williams' calling for a three to Hansbrough to win it. (Not meant to discredit what Maryland did by any means.)
- Nick Young-esque.
- Of course, if Gilbert or Antawn leaves the answer is obvious. If they both stay, I say go for a small forward with an outside touch.
- Pats and Packers.
by JakeTheSnake on Jan 19, 2008 11:40 PM EST 0 recs
Dunk contest idea
by hotplate on Jan 20, 2008 10:10 AM EST 0 recs
Draft picks
- point guard capable of stepping in for AD when the time comes.
- small forward with an outside touch
- defensive minded center
by hotplate on Jan 20, 2008 1:05 PM EST 0 recs
Great idea
Gilbert will absolutely destroy opposing teams reserves when he initially enters, give us a huge boost/infusion of explosiveness and energy, and be our focal point initially upon entrance of our 2nd unit that will make plays and get easy baskets for his teammates that come off the bench with him.
It immediatley makes our bench the best and most dangerous in the NBA.
Our starters have gelled as a great and cohesive unit that plays well in all phases of the game on offense and defense, dont fix whats not broken.
It allows Antonio to be in the game to set our tempo, get everyone into flow/rhythym, get our offense initiated with an unselfish tone, and allows Deshawn to be out there with him as our lockdown perimeter defender setting the tone for our defense with great perimeter defense.
Gilbert will still be on the floor to finish every game and will still play 30+ minutes a night, so we willl have 2 extremely dangerous closers in Gilbert and Caron that can create for themselves and their teammates on the floor in tight contests plus Antawn who is very dangerous in his own right at the 4 inside with Brendan at the 5.
Plus much more benefits that I wont get into now.
I think its a great idea overall and makes us so much more of a complete and dangerous team allaround.
by billy332 on Jan 20, 2008 4:52 PM EST 0 recs
I just don't see the point
Consider this. If we put him as a sixth man, how can we justify paying him max money in the offseason? You can't. How could you pay max money to a sixth man? And if we don't pay him max money, he's indicated that he's going to walk, so then we lose him. All because we didn't want to mess with the chemistry of a 21-17 team that isn't as good offensively as they are with Gilbert. It just seems like an overreaction to me.
Besides, for all this talk about better ball movement, we're not a better offense this year, and we're even averaging fewer assists per game. We're also predominantly a half-court team (20th in pace), whereas with Gilbert, there was that open-court threat that made our offense even more dynamic.
Gilbert's also a rhythm player, so I don't think he'd succeed if we cut his minutes. Daniels fills a role more than anything, so he can step in more easily.
by Pradamaster on Jan 20, 2008 5:58 PM EST 0 recs
Agree with Prada
No doubt, the defense has improved greatly, which is why we're surviving without Gil. We're holding opponents to around 44.5 % shooting percentage this year. But we were already showing that improvement during the first 8 games (when Gilbert was playing). In fact the shooting percentage allowed for those 8 games is slightly better than for the season as a whole.
Gilbert off the bench? Maybe for a game or two at the most to test his knee. But I want him back playing at his all star level for 35 minutes a game. He knows how to share the ball. He's been doing it for several years now. Also if you're the superstitious type, don't forget the Gil injured his knee last year in the only game that he did not start. He was being disciplined for being late or something.
by hotplate on Jan 21, 2008 10:01 AM EST 0 recs
Gil off the bench
Bring him off the bench, give him like 20-25 mins and keep him in for the fourth quarter. As he gets back in game shape, give him more minutes if he can handle them - but don't start him immediately.
Next year, if we still have Gil, he's definitely a starter.
by mamemimo on Jan 21, 2008 10:21 AM EST 0 recs
As a temporary solution
by Pradamaster on
Jan 21, 2008 11:50 AM EST
up
0 recs
Gilbert of the bench can be good -
by ooba on Jan 21, 2008 3:52 PM EST 0 recs








