It's just like a real camp, but mini-er

Hurry! We're going to miss the bus to VCU!
(AP Photo/Winslow Townson)
In a very Joe Gibbs-like move, Eddie Jordan is reaching for the reset button. According to ESPN.com Jordan is using the time between now and Thursday night's game as a "mini camp" to fix what's broken with the Wiz.
Perhaps as important, it will give Gilbert Arenas a chance to rest his knee which he said after the game felt stiff. As Truth About It noted, Gilbert wore a compression sock during warm-ups and you'd have to guess that played a big part in Gilbert's performance on Saturday night.
If you're Eddie Jordan, what would you make the main focus for mini camp? Please refrain from saying "Everything!" or "Breaking Hedo Turkoglu's legs."
0 recs |
8
comments
Comments
Focus
On offense, I'm not sure what you can do in practice to get Antawn and Gilbert's shots to fall in at a higher percentage during actual games. Maybe give them each a couple of days of to rest their legs.
by hotplate on Nov 5, 2007 8:26 AM EST 0 recs
Primarily focus on offense
Defending the 3 is clearly a problem, but I agree with Wooz's assessment that this team is actually looking better on defense, and has shown flashes of being capable on the defensive end. They just don't look comfortable on the offensive end, though. They aren't creating open looks for anyone, and that means the other team can get out and run on all the missed attempts.
So I say motion, motion, motion. Gil isn't gonna become Steve Nash, but he can at least get comfortable working the pick & pop with Jamison again. Where did our offensive sets go?!?
by sierradave on Nov 5, 2007 9:00 AM EST 0 recs
WWHD
I know, I know! We should have TASED him!
In seriousness, the offense has looked awful pretty much every second I've seen of the first three games. I can't count the number of contested, off-the-dribble jump shots from 18+ feet the Big 3 have taken early in the clock. I know they can make those occasionally, but it's never going to be a high-percentage shot, and you can get it with 2 seconds left on the clock as easily as with 12.
Our offense just is not efficient in any way. When the Princeton offense is working, we get a a lot of layups and open jump shots and make our way to the foul line. Right now, our only good offense is on BTH putbacks. Seriously, Kevin Martin, who for my money is one of the most efficient scorers in the league, dropped in 28 points on 14 shots against Dallas the other night (granted, in a loss). In 3 games, the Big 3 have 182 points on 171 shots -- not very efficient, and no one else on the team has half as many shots as any of the Big 3. They're not getting it done.
by Vanilla Gorilla on Nov 5, 2007 9:33 AM EST 0 recs
Really??
Are you sure you don't mean 171 points on 182 shots? If not, then they are actually more productive than I thought. A point a shot equates to a 50% FGP, not taking into account free throws. I'm not sure what point/attempt ratio is considered good when taking into account free throws.
by cuppettcj on
Nov 5, 2007 10:17 AM EST
up
0 recs
No, that's the right ratio
by crucifictorious on
Nov 5, 2007 11:37 AM EST
up
0 recs
I think we need to work on... offense?
We can scream about defense, defense, defense, but the fact is that we are never going to beat people on defense alone and we need to play to our strengths first, before working on other things.
We would be 2-1 (at least) if our offense is up to par and we were attacking the hoop. Its good that we have this break so we can stop this skid before it gets any worse. Its unthinkable that we have avoided the free throw line the way we did, when its one of our main strengths.
by mamemimo on Nov 5, 2007 12:39 PM EST 0 recs
Offense
There is one thing that is bothering though, I read on another board that offense in the NBA is all about mismatches. That EJ's offense is complete crap. I would just like to say why our Washington's and Phoenix's offenses quickly becoming the two most copied styles of play in the nba if running set plays is so unssuccesful.
by chmelikt on
Nov 5, 2007 1:07 PM EST
up
0 recs
Crunching the Numbers
+--------------------+--+---+----+---+---+-----+---+---+-----+-----+---+----+---+----+
|Name | G| FG| FGA| 3P|3PA| AFG%| FT|FTA|FTAPG| FT%| TO|TOPG| PF|PFPG|
+--------------------+--+---+----+---+---+-----+---+---+-----+-----+---+----+---+----+
|Gilbert Arenas |74|647|1548|205|584|48.4%|606|718| 9.70|84.4%|236| 3.2|249| 3.4|
|Antawn Jamison |70|512|1139|138|379|51.0%|226|307| 4.39|73.6%|104| 1.5|194| 2.8|
|Caron Butler |63|451| 975| 18| 72|47.2%|283|328| 5.21|86.3%|181| 2.9|188| 3.0|
+--------------------+--+---+----+---+---+-----+---+---+-----+-----+---+----+---+----+
Compare that to this season's stats:
+--------------------+--+---+----+---+---+-----+---+---+-----+-----+---+----+---+----+
|Name | G| FG| FGA| 3P|3PA| AFG%| FT|FTA|FTAPG| FT%| TO|TOPG| PF|PFPG|
+--------------------+--+---+----+---+---+-----+---+---+-----+-----+---+----+---+----+
|Gilbert Arenas | 3| 20| 60| 1| 17|34.2%| 24| 33| 11.0|72.7%| 15| 5.0| 11| 3.7|
|Antawn Jamison | 3| 18| 61| 6| 20|34.4%| 15| 19| 6.3|78.9%| 3| 1.0| 12| 4.0|
|Caron Butler | 3| 23| 51| 1| 5|46.1%| 13| 19| 6.3|68.4%| 17| 5.7| 11| 3.7|
+--------------------+--+---+----+---+---+-----+---+---+-----+-----+---+----+---+----+
As you can see, the Adjusted Field Goal Percentage for each of the Big 3 is way down. Also, both the Turnovers Per Game and the Personal Fouls Per Game for each is up. What might surprise some people is that the Free Throw Attempts Per Game for each is up. The Big 3 are getting to the line plenty. They're just not hitting their jumpers.
by cuppettcj on Nov 5, 2007 2:19 PM EST 0 recs













